The head of WADA explained why Valieva received the maximum penalty.

Read Time:36 Second

“Protected persons have some rights that are not available to the rest of us, but I don’t think two years is the maximum sentence for them.

There are opportunities that, if you like, make life easier for protected persons, while adults in a similar situation have to explain the offense. These opportunities were exploited by Ms. Valieva’s team.

The story that was provided to the court was a dessert made by her grandfather. No one believed it. There was no evidence to support this theory.

As a result, Valieva’s attorneys failed the athlete by failing to prove the source of the substance. They did not provide anything that was credible.

Therefore, she received the maximum penalty,” said Olivier Niggli.

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *